GENERAL OVERVIEW OF GOVERNANCE
1.0 Introduction
Some people fail to distinguish between the terms Governance and Government. They think that
these two terms mean the same thing and often use them interchangeably. It is therefore important
to distinguish the term governance from government in that on the one hand; governance is the
concrete activity that reproduces a formal or informal organization. If the organization is
a formal one, governance is primarily about what the relevant governing body does. If the organization is
an
informal one, such as a market, governance is primarily about the rules and norms that guide
the
relevant activity. Whether the organization is a geo-political entity
(nation-state), a corporate
entity
(business entity), a socio-political entity (chiefdom, tribe, family, etc.), or an informal one, its governance is the way the rules and actions are produced, sustained, and regulated. The word governance also refers to the activities of a government. In layman’s terms,
it
is the rules and laws made by the government that are sought to be implemented through a chosen bureaucracy. On the other hand Government refers to a body that comprises a person or a group of persons who run the administration of a country.
Governance is defined
Governance refers to all processes of governing, whether undertaken by a government, market or
network, whether over a family, tribe, formal or informal organization or territory and whether
through laws, norms, power or language.
According to the UNDP, (1997) in its policy paper, governance is defined as the exercise of
economic, political and administrative authority to manage a country’s affairs at all levels. It
comprisesthe mechanisms, processesand institutions,throughwhichcitizensand groupsarticulate
their interests,
exercise their legal rights,
meet their obligations and
mediate their differences.
The World Bank (1993) defined governance as the method through
which power is exercised in
the management of a country’s political, economic and social resources for development. While
the World Bank has focused on stabilization and State reforms that overwhelmingly focused on
civil service retrenchment and privatization for a long period, the early 1990s saw a change of
focus. The Bank came torealize that most ofthe crises indeveloping countries are ofa governance
nature. Hence, the contemporary adjustment package emphasizes governance issues
such as transparency, accountability and judicial reform. In
this context, the Bank has introduced
a new way of looking at governance good
governance.
According to Jon (2000), governance refers to sustaining coordination and coherence among a
wide variety of actors with different purposes and objectives. Such actors may include political
actors and institutions, interest groups, civil society, non-governmental and transnational
organizations. This definition illustrates that while the government of a traditional State has to cope with internal challenges and external challenges from the above actors, some of the functions previouslythe preserve ofgovernment maybe taken over some ofthe same parties. This definition
gives credence to the assertion made earlier
that
governance is broader than government.
Pierre and Peter (2000) perceive governance as processes in which
the State plays a leading role,
making priorities and
defining objectives. This is in line with the notion of the role of the State as
that of steering society and the economy.
Hirst (2000)
offers a more general definition of the term. He asserts that governance can be
generally defined as the means by which an activity or ensemble of activities is controlled or
directed, such that it delivers an acceptable range of outcomes according to some established
standard.
Canada’s Institute of Governance (2002)
offers another general definition, asserting that
Governance is the processwherebysocieties or organizations make importantdecisions, determine
whom they involve and how they render
account (UNESCO,
2006)
1.1 Good Governance
According to the World Bank, good governance entails sound public sector management
(efficiency, effectiveness and economy), accountability, exchange and free flow of information
(transparency), and a legal framework for development (justice, respect for human rights and
liberties).
Good governance is defined by focusing on four major components namely legitimacy implying
that the government must have the consent of those who are governed (people); accountability
which means ensuring transparency, being answerable for actions and media freedom;
competence which refers to effective policymaking, implementation and service delivery; and
respect for law
(rule of law) and protection of
human rights.
According to Munshi, (2004) good governance signifies a participative manner of governing that
functions in a responsible, accountable and transparent manner based on the principles of
efficiency, legitimacy and
consensus for
the purpose of promoting
the rights of individual citizens
and the public interest, thus indicating the exercise of political will for ensuring the material welfare of society and sustainable development with social justice.
Hirst (2000)
provided a more precise definition of good governance that it means creating an
effective political framework conducive to private economic action: stable regimes, the rule of
law, efficient State administration adapted to the roles that Governments can actually perform and a strong civil society independent of the State.
Every organization has unique needs and goals that will affect its approach to governance. No
single approach will fit the cultures or requirements of all organizations. For example, larger organizations will probably require more governance than
smaller ones.
1.2 Bad and Good Governance
Recently the terms governance and good governance are being increasingly used in development
literature. It reached a point whereby all evils in societies are associated with bad governance
practices. Additionally, the so called development partners, donors and international financial
institutions are increasingly basing their aid and loans on the condition that reforms that ensure
good governance are undertaken. Recently, these development supporters have retained their
financial support to the government of Tanzania demanding stern actions against ESCROW
scandal and culprits if any. This is a typical example of good and bad
governance.
3
Generally, Good governance ensures;
Participatory, transparency
and accountability among other
things
Effectiveness and equity
Promotion of rule of law.
That political,
social and
economic priorities are based on broad consensus in society
That the voices of the poorest and the most vulnerable are heard in decision making over
the
allocation
of development
resources.
It is therefore fair to summerize that sustainable development, social cohesion and environmental management are dependent on
good
governance and efficient public sector management.
For Bad/Weak governance system
Compromises
the delivery of services and
benefits to those who
need
them most
The influence of powerful interest groups biases policies, programs and spending away from the poor and lack
of property rights,
Police protectionand legalservices disadvantages the poor and inhibits them from securing
their homes and other assets and operating businesses.
Generates and reinforces and
subverts
efforts to reduce it,
Therefore, weak or bad governance is perceived to
be a barrier to
economic development to both domestic and foreign direct investment and this leads to the collapse of the nation state (UNDP,
1997)
1.3 Principles of Good Governance
Principle is conceptualized as a belief/basic belief or rule that has major influence on the way
something is done. It is also a rule/belief about what is right or wrong. The following are the
principles
of good governance according
to (UNDP, 1997)
4
PARTICIPATION
This means that, all people have the voice in the process ofdecision making which affect their life.
Authority to Participate in decision making is either directly or indirectly done and it is build up
under the freedom of
the
association or freedom of
speech. In schools, all
education
stakeholders
should
participate in decision making and
planning for
school development. The stakeholders are local government authorities, civil society and civil society organizations, parents, Media and
children (students) themselves. Generally, public involvement includes three elements or pillars such as Public access to information, Public participation in decision-making processes and Public
access to judicial and
administrative redress often termed
access to
justice. Access to information can be passive or active. Passive access is where the public will get information upon request to
government institutions. Active access is whereby the government is obliged to give and disseminate information. Access to justice is whereby the procedural rights of the public to information
are
respected and
guaranteed.
RULE OF LAW
5
The schools system in Tanzania is made up by rules, laws and regulations in both national level
and school level. Rule of law means allpeople are equalbefore the law and no one should be above
the law to ensure that the principle of right equityand equality is practiced in schools. Rule of Law
also means that Laws, regulations and codes of conduct should be fair and enforced impartially,
particularly the laws on human rights. The national level laws that are applicable in schools are like appeal against examination results, internal and external examiners, and employment. At school level,
there
are
students
by laws,
staff
laws,
power and duties of school administration and teachers
TRANSPARENCY
This is viewed as the free flow of information
that will affect people’s rights and wellbeing. This
means that
Processes, institutions and information are directly accessible to
those
concerned with
them, and enough information is provided to understand and monitor them. It promotes openness
of government action, decision-making processes, and consultative processes among public sector
and all stakeholders. The strategies to improve transparency in
education institutions in
Tanzania
are
through class meetings, school assembly,
dormitory meetings and students’ school BARAZA.
This will instill trust of leadership among students and teachers. Transparency is also achieved
through media and hence the media should be free and accessible.
The following photograph
identify
a typical example of
how transparency is supposed to be
6
Source (Photo taken from one Primary School September,
2014)
7
CONSENSUS ORIENTATION
Good governance mediatesdifferent interests toreach broad consensus onwhat is thebasic interest
of the group. Consensus implies two things which are the general agreements of the group and
theory and practice on how to reach agreements. It usually involves collaboration rather than
compromises in a sense that, instead of one opinion being
adopted
by a plurality,
stakeholders are
brought together until a convergent decision is developed. This practice is emphasized in
schools through school meetings, board meetings, school baraza, school assembly and other areas where
stakeholders can share the common
issues and
rich agreements
EQUITY
This refers to all people should have an opportunity to improve or maintain their well being. PEDP
and SEDP have achieved a great deal of equity in terms of enrolment of students to respective
levels of education. It has been supported by the tremendous process that has been taken in education sector like abolition
of fees and other monetary contributions coupled
with compulsory
requirements that parents/guardians should send all children to school. Policy Forum, (2013) emphasize that equity must include the following
Delivery of services without discrimination
of whatsoever.
Conducting
public affairs in a non discriminatory basis.
To value all people regardless of their
differences
Equal opportunities to social groupings and public at large
Try as much as possible to make each individual feel part and
parcel of the society
EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY
This means that processes and institutions produce results that meet the needs while making the best use of resources. On the one hand, efficiency
refers to the process of producing good results
by
using available time,
money,
supplies
etc
i.e. maximization
of profit or appropriate, timely and prudent utilization of available resources
in
achieving the desired results. Efficiency is determined by a number of factors such as attitude of personnel, availability of equipment (tools), financial resource,
employees’ motivation,
sound planning and
supervision/control.
8
On the other hand, effectiveness means producing the results that was intended i.e. timely
achievement of
desired results as measured against set goals. Effectiveness is usually determined
by the SMART rule which means that the set goals should be Specific, Measurable, Attainable,
Realistic and Time bound.
ACCOUNTABILITY
This means that decision
makers in government, the private sector and civil society
organizations are answerable to the public, as well as to institutional stakeholders. This accountability differs depending on
the
organization
and whether the decision is internal or external to
an
organization.
Inschools accountability is measured and influenced bytracking teachers and students attendance,
conferences sessions to
understand issues, coaching teachers, recognize and reward teachers who
are
performing their duties, Leverage community to create pressure and
Strengthen accountability and enforce disciplinary measures.
Accountability may be categorized into four
broad types:
It is associated with the idea of answerability, based
on the premise that individual identity is
determined by
one’s
position in a structured relationship
Liability, a second form of accountability, sees individual identity rooted in more-formalized expectations developed through rules, contracts, legislation and similar
relationships based on legalistic standing;
It is associated with
role-based expectations. Such roles foster blameworthiness as a basis for
shaping and directing one’s behaviour;
Its expectations are derived from an individual’s perceived status in a community where attributions come into play.
The following is an example of accountability of school head by showing how money received
from RADAR were spent
9
Source: A Photograph taken by the Author from one Primary School (Septemba, 2014)
Responsiveness
This means that institutions and processes try to serve all stakeholders within a reasonable
timeframe. Services delivery should not be delayed unnecessarily. In schools, responsiveness can be reflected through timely coverage of syllabus, timely attendance to
classroom sessions, timely
assessments and delivery of reports to parents. It also include timely honouring of teachers and
other worker’s demands like salaries and all other benefits. Policy forum (2013) also insists that responsiveness must
ensure
the following
Caring for
and listening to people’s problems and concerns Timely delivery of services in a quality condition
Ability to meet expectations of people.
10
1.4 Key determinants of Good Governance
Good governance consists of the
following six key factors according
to (Policy Forum, 2013)
Democratic constitution – It must result from consensus of all people and groups in the
country i.e. both legally
and legitimately accepted.
Security and observance of human rights – People’s welfare must be a central focus of any
governance system
Separation of powers – There must be no contradictions or overlap of responsibilities
betweenthe executive, Parliamentand Judiciarysinceeach arm has its own tasks according to
their areas of jurisdictions.
Independent Judiciary – It is important
that the Judiciary execute its functions without any
external force i.e. should
be free from interference
Freedom of speech – People should be allowed to air out their views without being threatened
and
undermined
Free mass media – This is considered a fourth
arm
of the state. It should therefore be free
so
that it can deliver information objectively and
scientifically.
1.5 Consequences
of Good Governance
Good governance leads to a number of positive consequences, including:
Trust of people towards organization or government
Establishment of direction i.e. knowing where one is heading
Enable the board to be connected to membership
and stakeholders
Enable possibility
of geting good decisions because people value work Enable the ability to weather crises in organizations
Financial stability
Sustainable development
Proper use of available resources
Reduction or absence of corruption
Reduction of
conflicts and conflicts resolution in a peaceful manner
Delivery of social services properly
Human rights are respected
No comments:
Post a Comment